Posts Tagged ‘Rick Santorum’

What is your Google Problem?

Posted: March 24, 2012 in Human Rights
Tags: , , , , , ,
1

A follow up post was published March 28 2012: Google is watching you

I recently received a request to delete someone’s comment on one of my blog posts. Apparently, googling her/his name was bringing my blog in the top three search results exposing that specific comment rather than other important content about her/him.

In this digital age, it is essential to keep track of what Google says about you. If it does not say anything, it can be a double-edged sword. You are either too careful to leave any digital footprints; “what are you trying to hide?”; or completely disconnected from the digital world; “what age do you live in?”

Have you googled yourself yet? If not, do it now. Do it often.

Many have googled you already, so don’t be the last.

Applying to a new job? Expect to be googled.

Moving to a new neighbourhood? Expect to be googled.

Dating a new person? You have already been googled, under Images, YouTube and News and with multiple different search terms.

With the power Google has to speak on your behalf, you need to learn to speak their language. It is important to weed out negative search results and promote make-me-look-good ones.

Google prides itself with a mysterious algorithm that ranks results. Money and political power do not appear to be able to crack that algorithm down. The Google Problem of USA 2012 presidential candidate Rick Santorum is one example. The best practice to optimize your name, business or organization’s search result is yet to be figured out. For now, here are few of the tricks I learned:

Create a blog and post frequently. A blog will give you initial control over what comes up first when someone googles your name or chosen keywords. Google likes fresh so blog regularly. Search terms leading to your blog will increase with every post. Try to link to your blog from other webistes. Linking from a .edu site appears to have a great impact. Tag articles and photos you want to promote with your full name. Share content that others might want to link to, content that will be relevant today and in 5 years. Share the link to you blog on all your social media accounts. Consider guest-posting on other blogs if you are not ready for a personal blog yet. Use your full name to tag those posts. Consider including your photo and tag it with your full name.

Update your bio on all your social media accounts and company profiles. Make sure to include links to your blog. Always use the same spelling of your name.

Use free third-party reputation-enhancers or internet content monitors like Yasni.

Optimize security options. Edit your security options on social platforms –  like Facebook,, Google+, Twitter – to suite your desire. Nevertheless, assume that most of content you post anywhere online is likely to get public and searchable, so choose carefully what you share even in closed groups, chat channels, and private forums. A single tweet you made years ago can come back and haunt you. Comments you make on public Facebook pages are also exposed by search engines.

Learn about Google‘s new privacy policy and how it might affect you. Be aware, as of March 1st 2012, all the information Google collects about you on its platforms — Google+, Google Search, YouTube and even Gmail — will be put into one database. Even though the likely motive for Google is to provide advertisers with affective traffic by monitoring consumer patterns and behaviour, your privacy is at stake. Search terms you use can reveal very personal information such as your age, sex, sexual orientation, health, location, religion and more. To view what Google already knows about you start with the Dashboard.

Dr. Marjorie Greenfield explains facts about pre-natal testing

Posted: February 27, 2012 in Health, Human Rights
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
0

Dr. Marjorie Greenfield, UHCMC General Obstetrics & Gynecology Division Chief and author of “The Working Woman’s Pregnancy Book”, dispels myths recently propagated about pre-natal testing by presidential-hopeful Rick Santorum.

Watch the video here

Emotional debate over prenatal testing continues

Dr. Marjorie Greenfield shares her thoughts on a series of comments from Rick Santorum citing pre-natal testing as one of the reasons he is against President Barack Obama’s health care law.

>>> debate over prenatal testing .

>> one of the things you don’t know is they require free prenatal testing . why? because free prenatal testing ends up in more abortions and less care that has to be done because we call the ranks of the disabled in our society.

>> that was one of a series of recent comments citing prenatal testing as one of the reason he’s against the president’s health care law . the christian post has an article with the headline, ob/gob/ ob/gyn, santorum was a right. what premayal care has developed into is a search and destroy mission. joining me now is dr. marjorie greenfield from case medical center . i should note your hospital is one of leading neo natal care facilities in this nation. i don’t want to get you locked up in a political or religious battle, but i want to talk about the science here. you have a colleague who is saying that this is a search and destroy mission. what is your response to that?

>> that’s really a terrible way to frame prenatal testing . it’s much more than about abortion. i think when you narrow it down that’s way, it’s politically motivated as opposed to talking about what happens with patients.

>> what are the numbers here? rick santorum says this results ting is done. i’ve read countless articles over the last ten days or first five days when first came up with this, i have to say, i’ve not seen a clear figure here. what can you tell me.

>> the decision about what you do with abnormal result s a personal decision. when owe talk about prenatal testing . wh what are we talking about? an ultra sound is k detect fetal abnormalities. the other tests are blood tests that can be done or a sampling which are the diagnostic tests that give you the true, final answer of what’s going on with chromosones. he used the term prenatal testing which is a much broader term than that.

>> i know you’ve written about how emotional this is. some families don’t want to do testing because they don’t want to face the decision of what to do next. it is a personal and a family’s choice here. you’re in contact with people every day who decide on testing. just take me through your world and the perspective of what women are looking for when they decide to go ahead with this.

>> when i frame this with patients, i say that people fall into three groups. there’s a group that don’t want to do any of this testing or screening because they know that they would not change their behavior at all based on the results and they don’t want to be worried about this during the pregnancy. there’s another group that knows that they would terminate an abnormal pregnancy and they want the information that they can get so they can make that decision. then there’s a large group in the middle that wants to know about the health of their baby so they can make the best possible decisions. they might decide to get in contact with asupport group so that they would learn more about this condition so they could make a good decision about what to do for themselves or they might, sometimes we’re talking bt about a condition that’s not compatible with survival. sometimes we get hospice involved for people that would not terminate but want as much information as possible. these decisions are incredibly personal decisions. the other thing i want to make sure people understand is that amnio is done for anybody that’s at increased risk for finding a problem. most are carrying healthy fetuses. one thing it turns out to be reassurance for the family and the baby ent doesn’t have a problem.

>> in most cases the baby is healthy?

>> the vast majority doesn’t find a problem.

>> you’ve said that overall this is commonly accepted and one of quotes is that this is like not covering an ultra sound . the ideas that are coming from rick santorumin that he would not want insurance to cover the prenatal testing .

>> right. you can do an ultrasound and find a very severe problem on a fetus that would not be detected by amnio. it’s an anatomical problem that could be severe and not compatible with survival or quality of life that family would go forward with. would that mean that the doctor would be not supposed to tell the family that this abnormal finding was there because the family might make a decision for abortion. you end up going down a path that really interferes with the doctors ability to take care of the patients and the family’s independence.

>> it’s a rejection for some of science here. this is science used to, as you pointed out, help with the mother to have a healthier child in the end here. if insurance cover it, that would mean on the wealthy perhaps would have the ability to have this testing done. i would imagine it’s quite expensive.

>> i looked into it. there’s quite a range of charges across the country but we’re talking about $2,000. that’s really going to be unreachable for a lot of people.

>> if you’re rich, you’d be able to do it and have this testing but obviously the other 99%, as we like to say, would not.

>> right. what you could end up having, for instance, i can give you an example of a patient that has a routine ultrasound, they see shotgun that makes it likely you find a problem and the family would have to make a decision, are they going to spend the money for the amnio or just be terrified for the rest of the pregnancy when it could be just fine.

>> we greatly appreciate it. we have been trying to get you on for two days. i’m glad you were able to make it. thank you so much.

>> happy to be here. thank you.